Bridging the Gap: Understanding the Age-Old Difference Between Old and Modern Violin Bridges
As a luthier, you know the importance of getting it right when it comes to bridge design. But what's the real difference between ancient and modern bridges? Can an old-style bridge really deliver a richer sound, or is it all just hype?
As a luthier, I have received countless questions about the differences between these two eras of bridge design.
So, what's the main difference? Well, it all comes down to height and angle. Old bridges were generally shorter, with a more subtle arch that allowed for easier playability. In contrast, modern bridges feature neck grafts that enable a more dramatic angle, allowing for higher strings to vibrate freely. This increased height gives a richer and fuller sound.
But here's the thing: installing a bridge is a delicate process. You need to precision-cut it to fit your instrument perfectly, ensuring no gaps between the bridge and top plate. Any misstep can lead to difficulties playing from string to string or even a dreaded rattle in the instrument!
Share a thought.
Have you ever had a violin with a rattle that drove you crazy?